|
Lenses are used to collimate incident
energy to prevent it from spreading in undesired directions. Hyperboloid
lenses are used in radar systems and communication multibeam systems.
The hyperboloid lens used in this example is of convex plane type. That
means that one side of lens is hyperboloid, while the other side (toward
radiation direction) is a planar. Waveguide used in this project is
specially designed to suppress back radiation. That was done by adding a
choke to horn aperture edge. Length of choke is equal to quarter of
free-space wavelength. This kind of waveguide is used in satellite
systems, radar application, etc. It is usually used as a feeder for a
reflector-type or lens-type antenna system.
Main characteristics of hyperboloid lenses are:
• They are electrically large,
• Dielectric lens influences the signal transition.
An antenna model which consists of hyperboloid lens and cylindrical
waveguide feeder, simulated using WIPL-D Pro 3D EM solver, is presented
here. Full model is shown in Fig. 1.
Quarter model, where dielectric layer can be clearly seen, is shown in
Fig. 2, while model of the waveguide feeder is shown in Fig. 3.
Our aim is to inspect simulation time and memory requirements, radiation
pattern and near field.
|

Figure 1. Hyperboloid lens and
waveguide feeder |

Figure 3. Cylindrical waveguide
feeder |
|

a) |

b) |
Figure 2. Quarter model of hyperbolic
lens and cylindrical waveguide: a) isometric projection, b) z projection
WIPL-D Simulation
Operating frequency is 25.5 GHz (K band – NATO band classification).
Antenna shown in Fig. 1, can be modeled using WIPL D Pro feature (Anti-)
Symmetry. That way, only a quarter of structure is modeled (Fig. 2),
which significantly reduces memory requirements and speed up simulation.
Radiation pattern in 3D and a phi cut are
given in Figs 4-5, respectively. We can observe relatively high
directivity and low side-lobes. Please note that the theta angle is
measured with respect to the xOy plane.
Distribution of near field is shown in Fig. 6. The physics of the lens
antenna is effectively illustrated in this figure, where we can clearly
see the changing direction of the EM wave as the result of the
hyperboloidal lens.
Number of unknowns and simulation time at
a single frequency are given in Tab. 1. Computer used for these calculations is
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950@3.07 GHz, 8 GB RAM.
|

Figure 4. Radiation pattern in 3D |

Figure 5. Radiation pattern in
phi-cut |
|

Figure 6. Near field |
Table 1. Analysis characteristics
|
Number of unknowns |
Memory [MB] |
Time [sec] |
|
3170 |
80.4 |
8 |
|
Conclusion
This kind of antenna is usually simulated using geometrical optics
methods. However, WIPL-D Pro successfully analyses that antenna using
MoM thanks to sophisticated techniques such as higher order basis
functions. Simulation times are very short comparing to other
computational methods of similar accuracy. This makes WIPL-D Pro an
excellent tool for tackling very challenging lens antenna designs.
Results given here by WIPL-D Pro coincide with theoretical expectations.
Download PDF
Back to Lens Antennas
|